John E. Rennie v. Ann Klein (Rennie I)

462 F. Supp. 1131 (1978)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

John E. Rennie v. Ann Klein (Rennie I)

United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
462 F. Supp. 1131 (1978)

Facts

John E. Rennie (plaintiff), a highly intelligent individual and pilot, began experiencing mental health issues in 1973 after his twin brother died in a plane crash. As of that date, Rennie was voluntarily and involuntarily institutionalized on at least 12 occasions at Ancora Psychiatric State Hospital in New Jersey. Rennie sued Ann Klein (defendant), commissioner of the Division of Mental Health and Hospitals at Ancora, for forced administration of the antipsychotic drug Prolixin, which causes the permanent side effects of involuntary facial movements and muscle activity. Antipsychotic medication is the accepted and most effective course of treatment for schizophrenia. However, the best course of treatment for bipolar disorder is lithium and an antidepressant. There was no consensus on Rennie’s exact diagnosis, which was either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. Rennie was found to be competent and refused to be treated with antipsychotic medication due to the side effects but was amenable to lithium and an antidepressant. Ancora treated Rennie with antipsychotic medication without his consent due to his suicidal and homicidal behavior.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brotman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership