John S. & James L. Knight Foundation, Inc. v. Urban Philanthropies, Inc.

248 So. 3d 233 (2018)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

John S. & James L. Knight Foundation, Inc. v. Urban Philanthropies, Inc.

Florida District Court of Appeal
248 So. 3d 233 (2018)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

In 2001, the Collins Center for Public Policy (Collins Center) submitted a grant application for funding to the John S. & James L. Knight Foundation, Inc. (Knight Foundation) (plaintiff). The Collins Center intended to undertake a community development project for the benefit of Overtown. The Knight Foundation accepted the application and awarded $3 million to the Collins Center, with $1.5 million designated for the purchase of real property by an independent nonprofit corporation referred to as the “land trust.” In 2002, the Collins Center established South Florida Smart Growth Land Trust, Inc. (the land trust) to acquire and develop land for the benefit of the community. The land trust purchased properties using the granted funds. In 2013, the land trust transferred the properties it held to Urban Philanthropies, Inc. (Urban) (defendant), a newly established nonprofit corporation. Urban sold the properties and allegedly misused the proceeds. The Knight Foundation sued Urban and some members of the land trust’s board of directors (defendants) (collectively, Urban), claiming unjust enrichment, among other claims. Urban filed motions for summary judgment. In response, the Knight Foundation argued that it had intended to create a charitable trust. The Knight Foundation’s position was supported by the testimony of its chief executive officer (CEO), other witnesses, and the documents referencing the land trust. The CEO of the Collins Center testified that the parties had not intended to create a trust; rather, the Collins Center had applied for and obtained a grant of funds that it needed to be able to use flexibly to benefit the community. The trial court granted summary judgment for Urban, and the Knight Foundation appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rothenberg, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership