Johnson v. M’Intosh

21 U.S. 543 (1823)

From our private database of 47,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Johnson v. M’Intosh

United States Supreme Court
21 U.S. 543 (1823)

Sean Carroll headshot
  • Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Play video

Facts

In 1773 and 1775, chiefs of the Illinois and Piankeshaw nations, American Indian tribes, made two purported grants of tracts of land to certain private parties. The tracts were in present-day Illinois. After the United States obtained its independence from Britain, the federal government sold land parcels to various buyers. Some parcels were on the tracts purportedly conveyed in the 1775 grant from the Piankeshaw nation. Joshua Johnson and Thomas Graham (plaintiffs), who inherited land from one of the grantees of the 1775 purchase, brought an ejectment suit against William McIntosh (M‘Intosh) (defendant), who had purchased some of the relevant land from the federal government. The district court declined to recognize Johnson’s and Graham’s title and thus ruled in M‘Intosh’s favor. The United States Supreme Court reviewed the decision.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 964,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
  • AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,500 briefs - keyed to 1,006 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Understand your casebook readings in seconds

Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.

Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.

Case book preview