Jones Motor Co., Inc. v. Holtkamp, Liese, Beckemeier & Childress, P.C.

197 F.3d 1190 (1999)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Jones Motor Co., Inc. v. Holtkamp, Liese, Beckemeier & Childress, P.C.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
197 F.3d 1190 (1999)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Elston Cannon brought a personal-injury suit against Jones Motor Company and its insurer (collectively, Jones) (plaintiffs) in St. Clair County, Illinois. Holtkamp, Liese, Heckemeier & Childress, P.C. (HLH&C) (defendant) represented Jones in the suit. The action was assigned to a judge who was reputed to favor plaintiffs in personal-injury suits. HLH&C failed to file a timely request for a jury, and the case was tried to the judge. The judge entered a judgment for Cannon for $2.8 million. Jones did not appeal the judgment or claim the judge committed error in trying the case. The case was settled for $2.5 million. Jones sued HLH&C for legal malpractice. Jones presented the opinion of an experienced St. Clair County lawyer that had the case been tried to a jury, the verdict would have been approximately $500,000. Jones sought damages of $2 million—the difference between the settlement amount and the lawyer’s estimate. The district court granted summary judgment to HLH&C. Jones appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 821,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership