Jones v. Fisher

42 Wis.2d 209, 166 N.W.2d 175 (1969)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Jones v. Fisher

Wisconsin Supreme Court
42 Wis.2d 209, 166 N.W.2d 175 (1969)

Facts

Aleta Jones (plaintiff) worked for a nursing home operated by Jerome Fisher and Clara Fisher (defendants). When Jones needed dentures, the Fishers loaned Jones the money. Not long after Jones received the dental work, she left the employ of the Fishers. When Jones collected her final check, a dispute arose over repayment of the loan for the dental work, spurring a brief altercation in which the Fishers physically restrained Jones and extracted her dentures. Jones was not bruised or scarred and did not consult a doctor. Jones filed assault and battery charges against the Fishers. In the trial, Jones also testified that she was embarrassed and humiliated by the incident and that her emotional state caused her to lose sleep. The jury awarded Jones a total $6,000 in damages: $1,000 compensatory and $5,000 punitive. The trial court ordered the Fishers to pay the damages. The Fishers appealed, not disputing the factual finding but arguing that the damages assessed were excessive. The Wisconsin Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Beilfuss, J.)

Dissent (Hansen, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership