Jones v. Waffle House, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
866 F.3d 1257 (2017)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
William Jones (plaintiff) was hired by Waffle House, Inc. (defendant) in Kansas. Before being allowed to start his employment, Jones was asked to sign an arbitration agreement. In this agreement, Jones gave up his rights (1) to sue Waffle House in court, (2) to pursue a class action against Waffle House, and (3) to have a court determine whether the arbitration agreement was valid and enforceable. Waffle House attempted to enforce the arbitration agreement to end an existing class action that Jones had previously filed against Waffle House in a federal district court in Florida. Jones argued that the arbitration agreement was not enforceable because it was unconscionable. The district court ruled that the agreement was not enforceable to stop the current class-action lawsuit and to force Jones to arbitrate his claim in that case. Waffle House appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Marcus, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 924,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

