From our private database of 32,100+ case briefs...
Jorgensen v. York Ice Machinery Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
160 F.2d 432, 332 U.S. 764, 68 S.Ct. 69 (1947)
Jorgensen (plaintiff) sued York Ice Machinery Corp. (York) (defendant) for negligence. The jury returned a verdict for York. Just before deliberations, the jury foreman had received news that his son had died. The foreman requested a postponement, but was denied. Jorgensen offered affidavits from jury members stating that the jury agreed to return a verdict based on a simple majority, rather than continue deliberations until a unanimous verdict was reached, to allow the foreman to return home. The judge denied Jorgensen’s motion for a new trial due to jury misconduct and entered judgment for York. Jorgenson appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hand, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 583,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 583,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 32,100 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.