Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
  • J
  • Joslin v. Pine River Development Corp.Joslin v. Pine River Development Corp.
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

Joslin v. Pine River Development Corp.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire
367 A.2d 599 (1976)


Pine River Development (defendant) purchased a large parcel of land adjacent to a lakefront subdivision and divided the land into 161 lots. Pine River also purchased one lakefront lot in the subdivision and dedicated it to the common use of its property owners. Joslin filed suit to enjoin Pine River from using the subdivision lot for lake access on the grounds that the use violated the subdivision’s deed restrictions. The trial court ruled in Joslin’s favor and issued an injunction prohibiting Pine River from using the subdivision lot for common access to the lake. Pine River appealed.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Kenison, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 449,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 449,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial