Judgment of 26 January 1989

1989 NJW 1477 (1989)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Judgment of 26 January 1989

Germany Federal Court of Justice
1989 NJW 1477 (1989)

Facts

A liquidator of the assets of a debtor (plaintiff) initiated a lawsuit in German courts related to a contract the debtor entered into in January 1977. The debtor produced injection-molded parts for a business party (defendant). The contract provided that the defendant could initiate a fast-track arbitral procedure. The contract also contained an annex containing three sections. Section 2 provided that the defendant would choose a neutral person to serve as an arbitrator. Section 3 provided for the procedure in arbitration, including requiring that the parties represent themselves in the arbitration and that lawyers be excluded from the arbitration proceedings. Section 4 provided that the amount of dispute of each procedure was limited to a certain amount, 7,000 Deutschmarks. Section 13 of the contract indicated the arbitration agreement was drafted unilaterally in favor of the defendant. The liquidator later initiated a lawsuit in the German courts.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership