Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Juicy Whip, Inc. v. Orange Bang, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
185 F.3d 1364 (1999)


Facts

Juicy Whip (plaintiff) sued Orange Bang (defendant) for infringement of the ‘405 patent, which claimed a drink-dispensing device. The patented device dispensed a “post-mix” beverage, which is one where syrup concentrate and water are mixed outside the view of the consumer at the time the beverage is being dispensed. However, the device also included a countertop display of agitating non-potable fluids meant to encourage a consumer to buy a drink. In essence, the consumer would see a large apparatus mixing a fluid and, enticed by the fluid, purchase a beverage thinking that they are receiving a visible “pre-mix” beverage, when in fact the consumer was receiving a “post-mix” beverage that is created out of sight. This device had the advantages of improved hygiene and ease of use, but in essence its purpose was to deceive the consumer. Orange Bang, on summary judgment, argued that the patented drink dispenser lacked utility under 35 U.S.C. §101 because its purpose was to deceive consumers. The district court granted the motion, holding the patent invalid, and Orange Bang appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Bryson, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 204,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.