Juliana v. United States
United States District Court for the District of Oregon
217 F. Supp. 3d 1224 (2016)
Juliana and others (plaintiffs) brought suit against the federal government (defendant), alleging that the government’s collective environmental policies caused global warming and the rising of the seas, thereby violating the plaintiffs’ fundamental due process rights and the public trust doctrine. The complaint alleged that the government’s acts and omissions resulted in natural disasters, food shortages, and destruction of property, among other things. The complaint alleged that the conduct violated the public trust doctrine because of the government’s failure to protect the atmosphere, water, seas, seashores, and wildlife. The government filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Aiken, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.