K & G Construction Co. v. Harris
Maryland Court of Appeals
223 Md. 305, 164 A.2d 451 (1960)
- Written by Matt Fyock, JD
Facts
K & G Construction Co. (K & G) (plaintiff) was a contractor for a housing-construction project. Harris and Brooks (defendants) owned an excavation company that was K & G’s excavation subcontractor. The parties agreed that the excavation company would perform work in a workmanlike manner. They also agreed that K & G would make installment payments monthly for the excavation work. In the course of the project the excavation company caused the collapse of a wall of the building and other damage. K & G withheld the installment payment due because the damage had not been repaired or paid for, and the excavation company discontinued work. K & G sued the excavation company for the cost of repairing the damage and for the additional cost of hiring another excavator to complete the work. The excavation company countersued, seeking damages for lost profits and to recover payment for work performed. The court found the excavation company liable for the repair cost but ruled in favor of the excavation company on its counterclaim. K & G appealed the judgment for the excavation company.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Prescott, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.