K & N Engineering, Inc. v. Bulat

510 F.3d 1079 (2007)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

K & N Engineering, Inc. v. Bulat

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
510 F.3d 1079 (2007)

  • Written by Philip Glass, JD

Facts

K & N Engineering, Inc. (K&N) (plaintiff) initiated litigation against Sarah Bulat (defendant) in the United States District Court for the Central District of California for trademark counterfeiting under 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1)(a). K&N sought to obtain statutory damages under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c) instead of actual damages under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a). Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117(b), a plaintiff could receive attorney’s fees alongside treble actual damages for trademark counterfeiting. By contrast, 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c) did not authorize awarding attorney’s fees in the event of a statutory-damages award. K&N filed a motion for summary judgment, which the district court granted, awarding K&N a statutory-damages award of $20,000 and attorney’s fees of $100,000. Bulat appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, alleging that the district court abused its discretion in awarding statutory damages under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c) and attorney’s fees under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(b).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ikuta, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership