Kahn v. Icahn
Delaware Chancery Court
1998 WL 832629 (1998)
- Written by Casey Cohen, JD
Facts
Amanda Kahn and Kimberly Kahn (plaintiffs) owned limited-partnership interests in American Real Estate Partners, L.P. (AREP), a Delaware partnership that acquired and managed real estate. The Kahns brought a derivative action on behalf of AREP against AREP’s general partner, American Property Investors, Inc. (API); API’s sole shareholder and chief executive officer, Carl Icahn; Bayswater Realty and Capital Corporation (Bayswater), a corporation affiliated with Icahn; and API’s other directors (defendants). The Kahns alleged that Icahn had breached his fiduciary duties to AREP and usurped corporate opportunities by keeping profits for API, Bayswater, and other affiliates. The partnership agreement for AREP provided that API could compete directly or indirectly with AREP, and thereby modified the traditional default rules of partnerships. The defendants moved to dismiss the Kahns’ complaint, arguing that the language of the AREP partnership agreement precluded the action.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Chandler, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.