Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Kahn v. Lynch Communication Systems, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware
638 A.2d 1110 (Del. 1994)


Facts

Alcatel U.S.A. Corporation (Alcatel) (defendant) owned 43.3 percent of the stock of Lynch Communication Systems, Inc. (Lynch) (defendant). The corporations began discussing a cash-out merger in which Alcatel would acquire Lynch. The Lynch board of directors formed an independent special committee to review the transaction. The committee reviewed and rejected three Alcatel offers. Subsequently, one of the members of the committee informed the committee that Alcatel was “ready to proceed with an unfriendly tender at a lower price” if the committee did not recommend Alcatel’s third offer. After this warning, the committee recommended to the Lynch board that it accept the Alcatel offer. The board did so and approved the merger. Alan Kahn (plaintiff) brought suit in the Delaware Court of Chancery, seeking to enjoin the merger. The trial court denied his motion for a preliminary injunction, and he amended his complaint to seek money damages. The trial court held that the committee’s analysis of the transaction was legally independent and thus shifted the burden of proving entire fairness of the transaction onto Kahn. The trial court then found in favor of the defendants. Kahn appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Holland, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.