Kang v. U. Lim America, Inc.

296 F.3d 810 (2002)

From our private database of 47,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kang v. U. Lim America, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
296 F.3d 810 (2002)

Facts

Soo Cheol Kang (plaintiff), a United States citizen of Korean origin, worked for U. Lim America, Inc. (American) (defendant). American was owned by Ki Hwa Yoon, and his son, Tae Jin Yoon (Yoon) (defendant), served as the company’s vice president and CEO. Ki Hwa also owned U. Lim de Mexico (Mexican), a company based in Tijuana, Mexico. Yoon was the president and CEO of Mexican. American managed Mexican’s business operations, controlling Mexican’s accounts, managing payroll, hiring and firing Mexican’s employees, and controlling Mexican’s supervisors. Kang and American’s five other employees, all of Korean descent, crossed the border into Mexico daily to work at Mexican’s factory. The other 50 to 150 factory employees were citizens of Mexico. Yoon often told Kang that Korean workers were better than workers from the United States and Mexico and were expected to work harder and longer. Overtime was mandatory. When Kang failed to live up to Yoon’s expectations for Korean workers, Yoon subjected him to verbal and physical abuse, yelling at him for extended periods, striking him with a ruler, kicking him, pulling his ears, and throwing objects at him. Eventually, when Kang cut back on his overtime hours, Yoon fired him. Kang sued American and Yoon in California state court, alleging disparate treatment and a hostile work environment based on his national origin in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII). After the case was removed to federal district court, American and Yoon moved for summary judgment, arguing that Title VII did not apply because American had fewer than 15 employees and that, even if it did apply, Kang’s allegations were insufficient to state viable claims. The district court granted summary judgment in American’s and Yoon’s favor. Kang appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Browning, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 916,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 916,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 916,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,300 briefs - keyed to 1,000 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership