Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
K

Karcher v. Daggett

462 U.S. 725 (1983)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Karcher v. Daggett

United States Supreme Court
462 U.S. 725 (1983)

  • Written by Philip Glass, JD
Play video

Facts

Shortly after a census, New Jersey enacted a state legislature reapportionment in the form of the Feldman Plan. This redistricting scheme did not conform to absolute numerical equality. A population discrepancy of less than one percent resulted between the largest and smallest district. New Jersey offered no further justification for this discrepancy but argued that the plan did not violate Article I, § 2 of the US Constitution. This redistricting resulted in oddly shaped, noncontiguous districts, misaligned with pre-existing political boundaries. Additionally, evidence indicated that the Democrat-dominated legislature dismissed neutral alternatives. The district court’s decision found that the Feldman Plan violated Article I, § 2. The Court heard this appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)

Concurrence (Stevens, J.)

Dissent (White, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 834,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Election Law

Key Terms