Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut
139 A. 695 (1928)
Joseph W. Andree (defendant) entered an oral agreement to purchase property from John T. Kearns (plaintiff). At the time, Kearns was constructing a home on the property. At Andree’s request, Kearns made certain alterations to the house. Andree ultimately refused to purchase the home. Kearns was able to sell the property after making further alterations at the purchaser’s request. Kearns brought suit seeking to recover his expenses for making the alterations requested by Andree and the purchaser, as well as the difference between the contract price and the price for which the house sold. The trial court found that the oral agreement was too indefinite to be enforceable, but allowed Kearns to recover the value of the alterations made for both Andree and the purchaser. Kearns appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Maltbie, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.