Keeter v. United States

461 F.2d 714 (1972)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Keeter v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
461 F.2d 714 (1972)

JC

Facts

Bessie Shaw was married to Daniel Shaw. Daniel had a life-insurance policy for $100,000 that he had purchased in 1919. In 1926, Daniel chose a settlement option that called for four $25,000 payments on his death to trusts for Bessie and the three Shaw children. Interest would be paid to each for life, and on the death of any recipient, the principal and accrued interest would be paid to the executors or administrators of the decedent. Daniel died in 1930. Bessie died in 1964. Bessie’s will provided that the residue of her property was to be divided evenly among her daughters. A general power of appointment created before October 21, 1942, was to be included in the gross estate of a decedent only if it was exercised. Daniel’s executor, Keeter (plaintiff), argued that the settlement option chosen by Daniel was not a general power of appointment by Bessie, as she never had the power to dispose of the insurance proceeds until after her death. Accordingly, Keeter did not include the funds paid to Keeter as executor—$25,000—in Bessie’s gross estate for estate-tax purposes. A prior decision in another circuit had held that under such a situation, as the proceeds were payable not by the decedent’s direction but by that of the original holder of the insurance contract, no general power of appointment was exercised. The government (defendant) disagreed, arguing that Bessie making a will was simply the conduit by which her power of appointment had been exercised, and it assessed a deficiency for the estate-tax return. The lower court ruled in favor of Keeter, and the government appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Goldberg, J. )

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership