From our private database of 30,900+ case briefs...
Kelley v. Chicago Park District
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
635 F.3d 290 (2011)
Chapman Kelley (plaintiff) was a famous artist known for floral paintings. In 1984 Kelley received permission from the Chicago Park District (Chicago Park) (defendant) to install a large garden display named Wildflower Works. By 2004, because the garden had deteriorated, Chicago Park dramatically changed the garden and reduced its size. Kelley sued Chicago Park for violating his right of integrity under the Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990. The district court held that Kelley did not hold a valid copyright in the work, because it lacked originality. Kelley appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Sykes, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 552,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 552,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.