Kellogg v. Blue Quail Energy, Inc. (In re Compton Corp.)

831 F.2d 586 (1987)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kellogg v. Blue Quail Energy, Inc. (In re Compton Corp.)

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
831 F.2d 586 (1987)

Facts

In March 1982, Blue Quail Energy, Inc. (Blue Quail) delivered an oil shipment to Compton Corporation (debtor). Compton was supposed to pay Blue Quail $585,443.85 for the oil in April 1982 but failed to pay. Compton induced Abilene National Bank (MBank) to issue an irrevocable standby letter of credit in Blue Quail’s favor on May 6, 1982. The letter of credit provided that MBank would pay Blue Quail up to $585,443.85 owed on Compton’s antecedent (i.e., preexisting) debt to Blue Quail if Compton did not pay by a certain date. In exchange for the letter of credit, Compton paid MBank $1,463.61 and gave MBank a $585,443.85 promissory note. MBank had a previous security agreement with Compton that covered the letter-of-credit transaction. That security interest attached in May 1980, when the security agreement went into effect. On May 7, 1982, several creditors filed an involuntary bankruptcy petition against Compton. Compton subsequently failed to pay Blue Quail, and MBank paid Blue Quail on the letter of credit. During the bankruptcy proceeding, Compton’s assets were liquidated and used to pay MBank’s secured claims against Compton, including the letter-of-credit payment to Blue Quail. Bankruptcy trustee Walter Kellogg filed an adversary proceeding against Blue Quail asserting that Blue Quail had received an avoidable preferential transfer through the letter-of-credit transaction within 90 days of the bankruptcy proceeding. Kellogg thus sought recovery of $585,443.84 from Blue Quail under 11 U.S.C. § 550. The bankruptcy court granted summary judgment for Blue Quail, and the district court affirmed. Kellogg appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Williams, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership