Kelly v. Loew's Inc.

76 F. Supp. 473 (1948)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kelly v. Loew’s Inc.

United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
76 F. Supp. 473 (1948)

Facts

Lieutenant Robert Kelly (plaintiff) was an officer in the US Navy during World War II. Kelly was assigned by his superior, Lieutenant Bulkeley, to command a torpedo-boat squadron in the Philippines. Kelly’s time in Philippines included many risky operations and heroic actions by Kelly, as well as a friendship that Kelly developed with a US Army nurse who cared for him when he was injured. In 1942, while in the US for training, Kelly was interviewed by a reporter, William L. White, who wrote and published an article and book about the historical events of torpedo-boat squadrons during the war. The narrative was largely based on the information Kelly provided to White in the interviews and portrayed Kelly as a courageous and honorable man. The book’s foreword acknowledged Kelly’s contributions. Thereafter, Kelly gave his consent to Loew’s Incorporated (defendant) to produce a motion picture depicting Kelly or a character based on Kelly. In 1946, Loew’s movie, They Were Expendable, was exhibited in theaters in Boston, where many naval officers were permanently stationed. The movie depicted characters based on Kelly and Bulkeley. Although the Kelly character was depicted as mostly honorable, there were scenes in the movie in which the Kelly character displayed impatience, a lack of respect for authority, and lack of self-control. This conduct was not commensurate with the traditional standards of a US Navy officer, and the Kelly character, overall, was portrayed less favorably than the Bulkeley character. Kelly filed suit against Loew’s for libel, arguing that the Kelly character portrayed Kelly in a negative light that had harmed his professional reputation and caused him had embarrassment and mental anguish.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wyzanski, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership