Kelly v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.
Ohio Court of Common Pleas, Ashtabula County
188 N.E.2d 445 (1963)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Kelly (plaintiff) sued her car insurance company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. (Nationwide) (defendant), to recover for damages to her truck. Nationwide claimed that Kelly’s policy was not in effect at the time the damage was incurred and attached a list of interrogatories to its answer. Interrogatory 2 asked if Kelly was the sole proprietor of the trucking business by which the truck in question was owned; Kelly’s answer was vague. Interrogatory 6 asked Kelly where the truck was when the damage occurred; Kelly answered that she did not know because someone else was driving the truck at the time. Interrogatories 10, 12, and 15-33 all related to matters that arose after the damage to the truck occurred; Kelly stated that she did not know the answer to these questions. In the end, Kelly answered all of the interrogatories, but Nationwide filed a motion to compel more complete answers.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pontius, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.