Kelly v. United States

140 S.Ct. 1565 (2020)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kelly v. United States

United States Supreme Court
140 S.Ct. 1565 (2020)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Play video

Facts

The George Washington Bridge (the bridge) is operated by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Port Authority) and connects Fort Lee, New Jersey, to the New York City borough of Manhattan. Baroni and Kelly (defendants) were public officials who realigned the toll lanes leading to the bridge so that commuters coming from Fort Lee only had a single lane. The lane realignment was purportedly for a traffic study, but the real reason was to punish Fort Lee’s mayor for not supporting the New Jersey governor’s reelection campaign. The realignment of the lanes resulted in time and labor costs for backup Port Authority toll collectors and traffic engineers. Baroni and Kelly were convicted of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C.§ 1343 and federal-program fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(A). The Third Circuit affirmed the convictions. Baroni and Kelly filed petitions for a writ of certiorari. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kagan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership