Supreme Court of Wyoming
15 P.3d 734 (2001)
Stephanie Kendrick (plaintiff) filed suit against Daniel Barker (defendant) for injuries that she had sustained when her vehicle collided with Barker’s tractor-trailer several years earlier. After a pretrial settlement conference, a mediator outlined the terms of a $40,000 tentative settlement agreement to settle all of Kendrick’s claims. Kendrick’s attorney timely accepted the offer and released Barker from all future claims. Thereafter, Kendrick informed her attorney that she did not accept the settlement offer, and hired a new attorney. Barker filed a motion to enforce the $40,000 settlement agreement. At a hearing, Kendrick stated that she understood the offer was intended to be the full amount to settle her claims and that she had not expressly reserved specific claims. Nevertheless, Kendrick argued that after the settlement conference, she had been diagnosed with a closed head injury and did not know whether the settlement would cover future medical expenses. Kendrick argued that mutual mistake precluded enforcement of the agreement. The trial court disagreed and granted summary judgment to Barker. Kendrick appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Golden, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.