Kenneth P. Yeager v. Iran

17 Iran-U.S. Cl. Trib. Rep. 92 (1987)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kenneth P. Yeager v. Iran

Iran-United States Claims Tribunal
17 Iran-U.S. Cl. Trib. Rep. 92 (1987)

Facts

In 1977, Kenneth P. Yeager (plaintiff) was offered a job at the Bell Helicopter International Company (BHI) to provide management and support to operations in Tehran, Iran (defendant). Beginning in late 1978, American citizens in Iran began to be subject to increasing harassment. In 1979, men claiming to be revolutionary guards acting on behalf of the “new government” forced Yeager and his wife out of their apartment and into a hotel, where the Yeagers were held for days. Eventually, Yeager was evacuated to Germany. Yeager brought this claim against the government of Iran. Iran claimed that the revolutionary guards were not authentic and that the guards’ conduct was not attributable to Iran.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 825,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 990 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership