Kenty v. Bank One, Columbus, N.A.

67 F.3d 1257 (1995)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kenty v. Bank One, Columbus, N.A.

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
67 F.3d 1257 (1995)

AR

Facts

Kenty (plaintiff) sued Bank One, Columbus, N.A. (defendant) under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). Specifically, Kenty received an auto loan from Bank One that stated Bank One would buy insurance to cover the vehicle if the lendee failed to buy insurance. Kenty did not buy insurance, so Bank One did so. Kenty sued Bank One under RICO when Kenty discovered that the insurance policy also protected Bank One against losses due to repossession or lendee malfeasance and that Bank One received insurance rebates on the policy that Bank One did not tell Kenty about. The policy did state “This Insurance Protects the Interest of the Lender in the Vehicle,” and Bank One sent Kenty notices with the code numbers of all the relative insurance endorsements. However, the policy contained no information about the rebates. The district court granted summary judgment to Bank One, finding Kenty failed to state with particularity a false statement of fact necessary for a RICO violation.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Merritt, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership