Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
872 F.2d 971 (1989)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Kerr-McGee Chemical Corporation (Kerr-McGee) (plaintiff) agreed to sell certain chemicals to Sabar Chemical Corporation (Sabar). As part of the sale, Sabar obtained a letter of credit from Park Bank (the bank) (defendant) in the amount of $1,002,000. The letter listed Kerr-McGee as the beneficiary. The letter required specific documentation for a draw on the letter, including an invoice listing the price at $167 per metric ton free on board (F.O.B.) vessel. The letter provided that it was to be governed by the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (UCP). Subsequently, Sabar requested a 30-day extension to pay Kerr-McGee in exchange for a 1 percent increase in purchase price. Kerr-McGee agreed, and the letter of credit was amended to require an invoice at $168.87 per metric ton F.O.B. vessel. The total amount of the letter of credit, however, remained unchanged at $1,002,000. After Sabar failed to pay, Kerr-McGee presented a sight draft and an invoice to the bank, both with a total $1,014,590.53 to account for the 1 percent increase. The bank dishonored the draft on the ground that the sight draft exceeded the amount of credit. Kerr-McGee submitted an amended sight draft for $1,002,000, but the total price on the invoice submitted remained $1,014,590.53. The bank again dishonored the draft, this time on the grounds that the amount of the invoice exceeded the amount of credit and the amounts on the draft and invoice were inconsistent. Kerr-McGee filed suit in federal court. Soon after the suit was filed, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) (defendant) assumed control of the bank. The district court granted FDIC summary judgment. Kerr-McGee appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.