From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
Kirby v. Illinois
United States Supreme Court
406 U.S. 682 (1972)
- Written by DeAnna Swearingen, LLM
Facts
Kirby and Bean (defendants) were arrested for robbing Willie Shard. After the arrest, police brought Shard to the station for a showup identification. Shard identified the defendants as the robbers. Kirby and Bean had not been told that they had a right to an attorney or requested counsel. Kirby and Bean made a pretrial motion to suppress Shard’s testimony. The trial court denied the motion. Shard testified about the original identification and identified Kirby and Bean in court as the perpetrators. Kirby and Bean were convicted by a jury, and Kirby’s conviction was upheld on appeal. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)
Concurrence (Powell, J.)
Dissent (Brennan, J.)
Dissent (White, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
