Knapp v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A.

60 F. Supp. 2d 566 (1999)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Knapp v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A.

United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
60 F. Supp. 2d 566 (1999)

Facts

Gary Knapp (plaintiff) sued Yamaha Motor Company, Ltd. (Yamaha Japan) (defendant) and Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. (Yamaha USA) (defendant) in state court for personal injuries he suffered while using an all-terrain vehicle. Yamaha Japan was a Japanese corporation headquartered in Japan, and Yamaha USA was Yamaha Japan’s wholly owned subsidiary organized and based in California. Both Japan and the United States were signatories to the Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters (Hague Convention). Upon filing his petition in state court, Knapp served the summons on the West Virginia secretary of state, who then forwarded the summons and complaint by registered mail to both Yamaha Japan and Yamaha USA at their respective principal business addresses, per the West Virginia service-of-process statute. The matter was removed to federal court, and Yamaha Japan moved to dismiss the matter for insufficient service of process, claiming Knapp’s service was invalid for failing to meet the requirements for effective foreign service of process set out by the Hague Convention.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Copenhaver, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership