Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

Kolkman v. Roth

Supreme Court of Iowa
656 N.W.2d 148 (Iowa 2003)


Facts

In December 1995, Corrine Roth (defendant) inherited farmland from her father. In 1996, Roth orally agreed to allow Dean Kolkman (plaintiff) to live on the farm rent-free if Kolkman would farm the ground and raise cattle. In June 1996, Kolkman and his wife moved onto the farm. In 1999, Roth demanded $550.00 per month in rent. Kolkman refused and filed suit against Roth for breach of the 1996 oral agreement. Roth sought summary judgment, arguing that the statute of frauds precluded enforcement of the oral agreement. The district court denied summary judgment. At trial, the district court found that Kolkman had established promissory estoppel and the jury awarded Kolkman $154,429.00 in damages.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cady, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 241,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.