Kraus v. Village of Barrington Hills

571 F. Supp. 538 (1982)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kraus v. Village of Barrington Hills

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
571 F. Supp. 538 (1982)

Facts

Horst Kraus (plaintiff) and his wife lived in Barrington Hills, Illinois (defendant). Out of their home, Kraus and his wife operated an organization called The Happy Medium Unlimited, which was an association of heterosexual couples who engaged in consensual sexual activities with one another. Barrington Hills officials attempted to stop Kraus from operating the organization. Barrington Hills zoning officials wrote to Kraus for violating a local zoning code. Barrington Hills also had its police officers surveil Kraus’s home and instructed officers to ticket individuals who went to Kraus’s home. The officers also noted the license-plate numbers of cars that went to the Kraus home. In response to the officers’ activities, Kraus sued Barrington Hills. Kraus claimed that Barrington Hills violated his First Amendment rights of association and sought injunctive relief and damages. Barrington Hills moved to dismiss the complaint.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Grady, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership