Kristinus v. H. Stern Comercio e Industria Sociedade Anonima
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
463 F. Supp. 1263 (1979)
Rainer Kristinus (plaintiff) purchased approximately $30,000 worth of gems from H. Stern Comercio e Industria S.A. (Stern) (defendant) while on a trip in Brazil. During his transaction with Stern, Kristinus was told by a Stern vice president that he could return the gems for a refund at the Stern location in New York City. When Kristinus’s request for a refund was denied in New York, he sued for specific performance under the oral contract entered in Brazil. Stern moved to dismiss on the ground that under Brazilian law, an oral contract for more than 10,000 cruzeiros, the currency of Brazil, is unenforceable.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lasker, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.