From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
Kubik, Inc. v. Hull
Court of Appeals of Michigan
224 N.W.2d 80 (1974)
- Written by Tom Syverson, JD
Facts
Hull (defendant) was an employee of Kubik, Inc. (Kubik) (plaintiff). Kubik sold hydrostatic drive units that were used in factory systems. Kubik’s cutting-edge model was called the Kubik Hydradrive, of which Kubik sold a total of 22. Hull gave confidential engineering information to one of Kubik’s competitors. Kubik sued Hull, alleging trade-secret misappropriation and unfair competition. The trial court entered a judgment in favor of Kubik and entered an injunction against Hull. The injunction permanently enjoined Hull from making, using, or selling the technology at issue. Hull appealed, arguing that the trial court’s remedy was too broad.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McGregor, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
