Kuhn v. Spatial Design, Inc.
New Jersey Supreme Court, Appellate Division
585 A.2d 967 (1991)
- Written by Ron Leshnower, JD
Facts
John Kuhn and Marlene Kuhn (plaintiffs) agreed to purchase a home in New Jersey from Spatial Design, Inc. (Spatial) (defendant) for $515,000. The Kuhns paid a $50,000 deposit. After failing to get a mortgage, the Kuhns decided not to go through with the purchase, and they sought to cancel the real estate contract. Spatial refused to return the Kuhns’ deposit and eventually sold the house to other purchasers for $434,000. The Kuhns sued Spatial for the return of their deposit, relying on the mortgage contingency in their real estate contract. Spatial counterclaimed, arguing that the Kuhns falsified their financial situation in their mortgage application and were in breach of contract. The trial court agreed with Spatial and ordered the Kuhns to pay Spatial almost $100,000 in damages, less the retained deposit. The Kuhns appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cohen, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.