Kumar v. Republic of Sudan
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
880 F.3d 144 (2018)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Avinesh Kumar and other family members of terrorist bombing victims (plaintiffs) sued the Republic of Sudan (defendant) under the Foreign Services Immunity Act (FSIA). Kumar served Sudan by having the court clerk mail a copy of the lawsuit to the Sudanese embassy in Washington, D.C. Sudan did not answer the lawsuit and defaulted. The district court awarded the claimants damages and denied Sudan’s request to vacate the judgments. Sudan appealed, arguing that service was invalid.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Agee, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.