Kurchner v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
858 So. 2d 1220 (2003)
- Written by Eric Cervone, LLM
Facts
Harry Kurchner (plaintiff) was a recipient of chemotherapy treatment. Kurchner was concerned the treatment would make him sterile. Therefore, prior to undergoing treatment, Kurchner and his wife decided to freeze Kurchner’s sperm with the South Florida Institute for Reproductive Medicine (SFIRM). Kurchner’s samples were later destroyed when SFIRM’s storage tank’s cooling system failed. Kurchner sued SFIRM. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. (State Farm) (defendant) provided liability insurance to SFIRM, but denied any coverage for Kurchner’s claim. Kurchner and SFIRM then settled, with Kurchner assuming SFIRM’s rights against State Farm to seek coverage for the claim. State Farm’s policy included coverage for bodily injury. Kurchner argued that the destruction of his semen samples constituted bodily injury. The trial court ruled against Kurchner. Kurchner appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ramirez, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.