United States Supreme Court
533 U.S. 27 (2001)
Kyllo (defendant) was arrested for growing marijuana in his home. The police came to discover the marijuana with the use of a thermal-imaging device used to detect the heat from the high-intensity lamps used to grow the plants inside. The thermal-imaging device was used by an officer on the street outside Kyllo’s home to scan the house. The scan revealed that part of the house was significantly hotter than the rest. The police used this information to obtain a warrant to search Kyllo’s home where they found over 100 marijuana plants. Kyllo moved to suppress the evidence seized from his home, but the court denied the motion. Kyllo then entered a conditional guilty plea. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)
Dissent (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 238,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.