LAN/STV v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co.
Texas Supreme Court
435 S.W.3d 234 (2014)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
The Dallas Area Rapid Transportation Authority (DART) contracted with an architecture firm, LAN/STV (defendant), to prepare plans and specifications for the construction of a light-rail transit line. DART then entered into an agreement with Martin K. Eby Construction Company, Inc. (Eby) (plaintiff) to construct the rail line according to LAN/STV’s plans. Eby and LAN/STV had no contract with each other. Early into the project, Eby discovered that approximately 80 percent of LAN/STV’s drawings and specifications were incorrect, resulting in considerable construction delays and increased expenses incurred by Eby. Eby filed suit against DART for breach of contract and later settled the matter for $4.7 million. Eby then filed suit against LAN/STV, asserting claims of negligence and negligent misrepresentation. After a trial, the jury awarded Eby $5 million. LAN/STV and Eby appealed. The court of appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court. The Supreme Court of Texas granted certiorari to review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hecht, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.