LAN/STV v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co.

435 S.W.3d 234 (2014)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

LAN/STV v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co.

Texas Supreme Court
435 S.W.3d 234 (2014)

Play video

Facts

The Dallas Area Rapid Transportation Authority (DART) contracted with an architecture firm, LAN/STV (defendant), to prepare plans and specifications for the construction of a light-rail transit line. DART then entered into an agreement with Martin K. Eby Construction Company, Inc. (Eby) (plaintiff) to construct the rail line according to LAN/STV’s plans. Eby and LAN/STV had no contract with each other. Early into the project, Eby discovered that approximately 80 percent of LAN/STV’s drawings and specifications were incorrect, resulting in considerable construction delays and increased expenses incurred by Eby. Eby filed suit against DART for breach of contract and later settled the matter for $4.7 million. Eby then filed suit against LAN/STV, asserting claims of negligence and negligent misrepresentation. After a trial, the jury awarded Eby $5 million. LAN/STV and Eby appealed. The court of appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court. The Supreme Court of Texas granted certiorari to review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hecht, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 807,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership