Lanco International, Inc. v. Argentine Republic
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
40 I.L.M. 457 (1998)
- Written by Ryan McCarthy, JD
Facts
Lanco (plaintiff) was a shareholder of a corporation that won a bid to Argentina (defendant) to construct a port terminal. The agreement included a forum-selection clause setting jurisdiction in an Argentine tribunal. A dispute arose between Lanco and Argentina, which Lanco made Argentina aware of by letter in March 1997. In September 1997, Lanco wrote to Argentina consenting to arbitration by the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) under the Argentina-U.S. Treaty (the Treaty), a bilateral investment treaty. Argentina contended that ICSID lacked jurisdiction because of the forum-selection clause in the agreement. The ICSID tribunal addressed whether it had jurisdiction over the dispute.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.