Land v. Jerry Lewis Productions, Inc.

140 U.S.P.Q. 351 (1964)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Land v. Jerry Lewis Productions, Inc.

California Superior Court
140 U.S.P.Q. 351 (1964)

SH

Facts

Land (plaintiff) met Jerry Lewis (defendant), a prominent motion picture producer, at a soda fountain. Land told Lewis that she had written a script with him in mind and asked Lewis to consider it. According to Land, Lewis sat down beside her, and conversation ensued in which Land outlined the ideas of her script entitled “Treat Me Beat” and obtained a promise from Lewis to read it. Two days later, Land notified Lewis that she was planning to mail her script to him the following week. In response, Land received a letter from Lewis enclosing a release form for her to sign and return with the script. Land promptly submitted the signed release form and script to Lewis. A month later, the script was returned to Land with regrets. After Lewis’s release of the movie The Nutty Professor, Land filed suit for breach of implied-in-fact contract. Lewis moved for summary judgment on the ground that the release was a complete bar to any claim for breach of contract to pay for ideas disclosed to Lewis.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fleming, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership