From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
Landi v. Arkules
Arizona Court of Appeals
835 P.2d 458 (1992)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Landi (plaintiff) hired David Arkules (defendant) to perform a private investigation. Arkules did not have the license to perform such services that Arizona required. Landi sued Arkules, claiming that the parties’ contract was unenforceable because Arkules did not have a license. Arkules argued that even if the contract was unenforceable, he was entitled to restitution or other equitable relief due to his services actually performed under the contract. The trial court ruled that the contract was unenforceable and that Arkules was not entitled to any relief. Arkules appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lankford, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
