United States Supreme Court
459 U.S. 21 (1982)
Plasencia (plaintiff) was born in El Salvador and entered the United States as a permanent resident alien in 1940. She married a United States citizen. In 1975, Plasencia and her husband traveled to Mexico and agreed to help six Mexican and Salvadoran nationals to enter the United States illegally. Several days later, Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) agents at the border discovered the nationals and detained Plasencia for an exclusion hearing pursuant to Section 212(a)(31) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952. An immigration law judge found by clear and convincing evidence that Plasencia had knowingly aided nonresident aliens trying to enter the United States in violation of law. As a result, Plasencia was excluded from reentering the United States. The Supreme Court granted certiorari on appeal.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (O‘Connor, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 241,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.