Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Latrobe Steel Co. v. United Steelworkers of America

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
545 F.2d 1336 (1976)


Facts

Latrobe Steel Company (Latrobe) (plaintiff) had production and maintenance employees who were represented by United Steelworkers of America and its Local Union No. 1537 (United) (defendants). Latrobe and United were parties to a collective-bargaining agreement that contained a broad no-strike clause and an arbitration provision. United and another local union representing office workers were the certified representatives of the employees at the Latrobe plant. The office workers established a picket line outside the Latrobe building after efforts to negotiate a collective-bargaining agreement between the office workers and Latrobe failed. The United production workers refused to enter the plant because of the picket line. Latrobe brought an action in federal district court under section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 185, seeking (1) a temporary restraining order against the refusal of the production workers to cross the picket line and (2) an order holding United and certain officers and members in civil contempt after continued refusal by the workers. The district court granted the preliminary injunction and issued a contempt order imposing a $10,000 fine payable to the United States if the production employees did not report for the next shift, and an additional $10,000 payable to the United States for each subsequent day that United failed to comply with the injunction. United appealed, arguing that the district court had no jurisdiction to issue the preliminary injunction and that the civil-contempt order should therefore be vacated.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Adams, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.