Law v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
134 F.3d 1010 (1998)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Law (plaintiff) and a number of other college basketball coaches (collectively plaintiffs) filed a class action suit against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) (defendant) claiming that an NCAA rule violated federal antitrust laws, specifically § 1 of the Sherman Act. The “restricted earnings coach” rule limited annual compensation of some Division I entry-level coaches to $16,000. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs on the issue of liability and issued a permanent injunction prohibiting the NCAA from implementing the “restrict earnings coach” rule. The NCAA appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ebel, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.