Lawson v. Halpern-Reiss

212 A.3d 1213 (2019)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Lawson v. Halpern-Reiss

Vermont Supreme Court
212 A.3d 1213 (2019)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Elizabeth Lawson (plaintiff) was intoxicated. Lawson got a laceration on her arm, so she drove herself to the Central Vermont Medical Center (the hospital) (defendant) for treatment. The charge nurse detected alcohol on Lawson’s breath. Hospital staff administered a blood-alcohol-concentration test on Lawson, which revealed a blood-alcohol level of .215, over two and one-half times the legal limit. Lawson received treatment for her laceration, and she was cleared for discharge. Because the charge nurse knew that Lawson did not have a ride home from the hospital, the charge nurse informed a police officer on duty in the emergency room that Lawson had driven herself to the hospital, she was about to drive herself home, and she was intoxicated. The police officer arrested Lawson on suspicion of driving while intoxicated although the charge was later dismissed. Two years later, Lawson sued the charge nurse and the hospital. Lawson alleged damages stemming from the charge nurse’s violation of the standard of care for medical providers in negligently disclosing information obtained during Lawson’s medical treatment and from the hospital’s lack of training and policies regarding information disclosure. The charge nurse and the hospital moved for summary judgment, arguing that a tort action for the disclosure of medical information did not exist. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the hospital; the charge nurse had already been dismissed from the case. Lawson appealed, arguing that the court ought to recognize a common-law private remedy for breach of confidentiality by a medical provider.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Eaton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership