Ledesma v. Jack Stewart Produce, Inc.

816 F.2d 482 (1987)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
L
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ledesma v. Jack Stewart Produce, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
816 F.2d 482 (1987)

Facts

In Arizona, Alfonso Ledesma and others (Ledesma) (plaintiffs) were injured when their van was struck by a tractor. The tractor was driven by John Wayne Mize (defendant) and owned by Jack Stewart Produce, Inc. (JSP) (defendant). Ledesma and the other injured passengers were residents of California. Ledesma filed a negligence suit in federal district court in California against Mize, Jack Stewart (defendant) in his individual capacity, and JSP. Mize was an Arkansas resident, Stewart was an Oklahoma resident, and JSP was an Oklahoma corporation. Mize, Stewart, and JSP moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that California’s one-year statute of limitations barred the action. Arizona and Oklahoma each had a two-year statute of limitations, and Arkansas had a three-year statute of limitations. The district court applied California law and dismissed the complaint. Ledesma appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Nelson, J.)

Dissent (Noonan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Conflict of Laws

Key Terms