Lehigh Valley R.R. Co. v. Germany (Sabotage Cases) (United States v. Germany)

8 R.I.A.A. 104 (1932)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Lehigh Valley R.R. Co. v. Germany (Sabotage Cases) (United States v. Germany)

Mixed Claims Commission
8 R.I.A.A. 104 (1932)

Facts

The United States (plaintiff) alleged that German sabotage agents blew up two buildings in the United States: the Black Tom Terminal in 1916 and the Kingsland Plant in 1917. The United States sought to hold Germany (defendant) responsible for these acts. The Mixed Claims Commission had previously dismissed the claims, but it agreed to reopen the matter to receive new evidence. In particular, the United States produced evidence of a secret message acknowledging German agents were responsible for the destruction of the buildings. Germany disputed the authenticity of the letter, and experts on both sides submitted expert opinions in support of and against a finding of authenticity.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Roberts, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership