Leichtman v. WLW Jacor Communications, Inc.

634 N.E.2d 697 (1994)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
L
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Leichtman v. WLW Jacor Communications, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals
634 N.E.2d 697 (1994)

Play video

Facts

Leichtman (plaintiff) was a nationally-known, anti-smoking advocate. He was invited to appear on the WLW Bill Cunningham radio talk show. He was asked to discuss the harmful effects of smoking and second-hand smoke. During Leichtman’s appearance, Furman, one of the show’s hosts, lit a cigar and blew the smoke in Leichtman’s face. Leichtman filed suit against WLW Jacor Communications, Inc., Cunningham, and Furman (the show and its hosts) (defendants), alleging intentional battery. Leichtman alleged that Furman blew smoke in his face to cause “physical discomfort, humiliation, and distress.” The show and its hosts moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. The trial court granted the motion. Leichtman appealed to the Court of Appeals of Ohio.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Torts

Key Terms