Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Lemoge v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
587 F.3d 1188 (2009)


Facts

Mark Lemoge (plaintiff) suffered a serious leg injury at a military facility when a concrete park bench collapsed and fell on him. Mark and his wife, Roxina Lemoge (plaintiff), filed an administrative tort claim pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) with the Department of the Navy (Navy). The claim was denied. The Lemoges filed suit in federal district court against the United States (defendant) pursuant to the FTCA. The Lemoges’ attorney, Mark Caruana, sent a copy of the summons and complaint to the Navy’s administrative-claims attorney. The Navy attorney notified Caruana by mail that the documents needed to be delivered to the United States attorney’s office. However, during this time, Caruana suffered serious medical complications related to an injury that left him unable to tend to his legal business for several months. Consequently, the service of the pleadings was never completed, and the district court dismissed the complaint. Upon learning that the case had been dismissed, Caruana filed a motion to set aside the dismissal and to extend the time to serve the summons and complaint. The district court denied the motion, construing it as a motion for relief pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 60(b)(1) based upon excusable neglect, and held that the Lemoges were barred by the statute of limitations from re-filing the action. The Lemoges appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Gould, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.